Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Islamic Education Journal: An Indonesian Journal maintains peer review standards while increasing process efficiency.

The initial review process is at least 2 months. The review process uses a double-blind peer review.

All research articles published in Islamic Education Journal: An Indonesian Journal underwent full peer review, the main characteristics of which are listed below:

• All research articles are reviewed by at least two qualified experts
• All publication decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal based on the reviews provided
• Editorial Board members provide insight, advice and guidance to the Editor in Chief in general and to assist decision-making on specific submissions
• The Managing Editor provides administrative support that enables Islamic Education Journal: An Indonesian Journal to maintain the integrity of peer review while providing fast turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors.
• Islamic Education Journal: An Indonesian Journal benefits through the process of referring manuscripts from high quality peer reviews conducted by established journals.

Peer review of referenced papers:

The editors of the Islamic Education Journal: An Indonesian Journal will immediately decide whether to accept, reject, or request revision of the referenced paper based on reviews and editorial insights from the supporting journals. In addition, the Editor will have the option to seek additional reviews when needed. Authors will be notified when the Editor decides further review is necessary.

 

Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted directly to Islamic Education Journal: An Indonesian Journal will be fully peer reviewed by at least two qualified experts in the field chosen by the Editor in Chief. The Chief Editor or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

The editor will decide whether each submission reports on well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Priority assessment will not be a factor in decision making, but all papers should make additional or new additions to the literature.